Template:Combination of accounts capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The banker’s right to [[Combination of accounts|combine accounts]] arises where a customer has multiple [[bank account]]s, some of which are in debit and some in credit. It is sometimes balled a Banker’s ''[[set-off]]'' but, in 1972’s (still leading) case {{casenote|National Westminster Bank Ltd|Halesowen}}, Lord Buckley noted it isn’t a [[set off]] right so much as a function of accounting:
The banker’s right to [[Combination of accounts|combine accounts]] arises where a customer has multiple [[bank account]]s, usually where some are in debit and some in credit. This stands to reason, obviously — unless there are multiple accounts, all overdrawn, but onely some of them benefit from a security interest. It is sometimes called a Banker’s ''[[set-off]]'' but, in 1972’s (still leading) case {{casenote|National Westminster Bank Ltd|Halesowen}}, Lord Buckley noted it isn’t a [[set off]] right so much as a function of accounting:


:“Nor is it a [[set-off]] situation, which postulates mutual but independent obligations between the two parties. It is an ''accounting'' situation, in which the existence and amount of one party’s liability to the other can only be ascertained by discovering the ultimate balance of their mutual dealing.” the [[combination of accounts]].
:“Nor is it a [[set-off]] situation, which postulates mutual but independent obligations between the two parties. It is an ''accounting'' situation, in which the existence and amount of one party’s liability to the other can only be ascertained by discovering the ultimate balance of their mutual dealing.”  


[[Combination of accounts]] is arguably available in any situation where one party has multiple accounts with another in one currency. Some questions arise when they are in different currencies.<ref>See also {{cite|Fearns|Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Limited|2010|EWHC|2366}}.</ref>
Combination of accounts is arguably available in any situation where one party has multiple accounts with another in one currency. Some questions arise when they are in different currencies.<ref>See also {{cite|Fearns|Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Limited|2010|EWHC|2366}}.</ref>

Revision as of 15:54, 11 October 2021

The banker’s right to combine accounts arises where a customer has multiple bank accounts, usually where some are in debit and some in credit. This stands to reason, obviously — unless there are multiple accounts, all overdrawn, but onely some of them benefit from a security interest. It is sometimes called a Banker’s set-off but, in 1972’s (still leading) case National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen, Lord Buckley noted it isn’t a set off right so much as a function of accounting:

“Nor is it a set-off situation, which postulates mutual but independent obligations between the two parties. It is an accounting situation, in which the existence and amount of one party’s liability to the other can only be ascertained by discovering the ultimate balance of their mutual dealing.”

Combination of accounts is arguably available in any situation where one party has multiple accounts with another in one currency. Some questions arise when they are in different currencies.[1]

  1. ↑ See also Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Limited [2010] EWHC 2366.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Combination_of_accounts_capsule&oldid=59796"