Non-affected Party - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{manual|MI|2002|Non-affected Party|Section|Non-affected Party| | {{manual|MI|2002|Non-affected Party|Section|Non-affected Party|comp}} |
Revision as of 12:40, 31 December 2020
Content and comparisons
A clause so joyously well-crafted in 1992, that ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ saw no need to change it a decade later, when the opportunity presented itself. They might have grasped it to devise a concept less clumsy than “the Non-affected Party or the Non-defaulting Party, as the case may be” — you know, like “Innocent Party”, or something like that — but perhaps that’s just me.
See also
- Affected Party
- Defaulting Party
- Non-defaulting Party
- Innocent Party — not an official ISDA term, but our own contrivance, which we see as fan fiction, or part of the expanded ISDA universe.