Semantic code project: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Step 1: Select a standard proposition. These will be coded with a “c-” and you can find a complete list here: | Step 1: '''standard proposition''': Select a standard proposition. These will be coded with a “c-” and you can find a complete list here: | ||
<categorytree mode="pages" namespaces="Template" depth="0">Template propositions</categorytree> | <categorytree mode="pages" namespaces="Template" depth="0">Template propositions</categorytree> | ||
If there isn’t one, create a new one — but note, the name of the game is to have as few “canonical” propositions as possible. The form should be: | |||
{{subtable|'''Name''': t-[NAME] | |||
'''Content''': | |||
<nowiki>'''Label''': <section begin=label/>{{PAGENAME}}<section end=label/>. <br> | |||
'''What''': <section begin=what/> <section end=what/>. <br> | |||
'''Which''': <section begin=which/> <section end=which/>. <br> | |||
'''Where''': <section begin=where/> <section end=where/>. <noinclude>{{c|Template propositions}}</noinclude></nowiki>}} | |||
Step 2: | |||
==To do== | |||
Devise a proposition labelling taxonomy, that can neatly (and predictably) cover: proposition type, agreement type, location and clause reference |
Revision as of 16:04, 2 January 2021
Step 1: standard proposition: Select a standard proposition. These will be coded with a “c-” and you can find a complete list here:
If there isn’t one, create a new one — but note, the name of the game is to have as few “canonical” propositions as possible. The form should be:
Name: t-[NAME] Content: '''Label''': <section begin=label/>{{PAGENAME}}<section end=label/>. <br> '''What''': <section begin=what/> <section end=what/>. <br> '''Which''': <section begin=which/> <section end=which/>. <br> '''Where''': <section begin=where/> <section end=where/>. <noinclude>{{c|Template propositions}}</noinclude> |
Step 2:
To do
Devise a proposition labelling taxonomy, that can neatly (and predictably) cover: proposition type, agreement type, location and clause reference