Template:First law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''The [[JC]]’s [[first law of worker entropy]]''' (also known as the “[[meeting paradox]]”): | '''The [[JC]]’s [[first law of worker entropy]]''' (also known as the “[[meeting paradox]]”): | ||
:(i) The probability of a meeting | :(i) The probability of a meeting starting on time can never be 100%; | ||
:(ii) As the number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero. | :(ii) As the number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero. | ||
:(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be | :(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be. <br> | ||
As a consequence of these axioms there is an upper bound on the | This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since {{otto}} proved (“[[occursum ergo es]]”) that a meeting in the meaningful sense must have two people. As a consequence of these axioms there is thus a lower and an upper bound on the number of people possible in a viable meeting of a given duration. <br> |
Revision as of 09:41, 2 September 2023
The JC’s first law of worker entropy (also known as the “meeting paradox”):
- (i) The probability of a meeting starting on time can never be 100%;
- (ii) As the number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero.
- (iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be.
This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since Otto Büchstein proved (“occursum ergo es”) that a meeting in the meaningful sense must have two people. As a consequence of these axioms there is thus a lower and an upper bound on the number of people possible in a viable meeting of a given duration.