SEC no-action letter relating to prime brokerage: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|pb|}}One of the sacred artefacts of US prime brokerage; deep lore that we foreigners ought not speak. ''But''. It does have a rather succinct description of what prime b..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
When a customer places an order with the [[executing broker]] it informs the [[prime broker]] who records the transaction in the customer’s prime brokerage account and in an account with the executing broker.}} | When a customer places an order with the [[executing broker]] it informs the [[prime broker]] who records the transaction in the customer’s prime brokerage account and in an account with the executing broker.}} | ||
So, for the purposes of the proposal, you have three actions going on: | |||
*'''Customer order''' to executing broker | |||
*'''Trade settlement''' settlement of the customer order between the executing broker and the prime broker on the customer’s behalf, which the [[prime broker]] settles out of its own funds | |||
*'''[[Margin loan]]''': A resulting [[margin loan]] between prime broker and customer (in the amount paid by [[prime broker]] to executing broker to settle the trade. | |||
Englishers should note that these transactions have a unusual quality of [[agency]] about them, the unintended consequences of which the SEC no-action letter is meant to ameliorate. In an English law arrangement, the trade settlement would be regarded as a [[principal]] trade from the get go — the practical difference between a [[delivery versus payment]] trade settlement done as ''[[agent]]'' and one done as [[principal]] being nil anyway. | |||
===Proposal=== | |||
[[Regulation T]] provides that | |||
The prime broker committee, chaired by Bear Stearns (remember them?) proposed to treat the trade settlement transaction between the [[prime broker]] and [[executing broker]] as an inter-dealer (principal) trade even though theoretically executed as agent for the client. |
Revision as of 09:47, 9 February 2021
Prime Brokerage Anatomy™
|
One of the sacred artefacts of US prime brokerage; deep lore that we foreigners ought not speak.
But.
It does have a rather succinct description of what prime brokerage, for the most part, is. Made somewhat succincter, the JC reads the gist as follows:
Prime brokerage is the process by which a registered broker-dealer clears and settles of securities trades for its customers. It involves three distinct parties: the prime broker, the executing broker, and the customer.
The prime broker is a registered broker-dealer that clears and finances the trades the customer has executed with an “executing broker” — another registered broker-dealer at the customer’s request.
Each executing broker receives a letter from the prime broker agreeing to clear and carry each trade placed with it by the customer, where the customer directs delivery of money or securities under the trade to be made to or by the prime broker, to an account the customer maintains with the prime broker.
Orders placed with the executing broker are effected through an account with the executing broker in the name of the prime broker for the benefit of the customer.
When a customer places an order with the executing broker it informs the prime broker who records the transaction in the customer’s prime brokerage account and in an account with the executing broker.
So, for the purposes of the proposal, you have three actions going on:
- Customer order to executing broker
- Trade settlement settlement of the customer order between the executing broker and the prime broker on the customer’s behalf, which the prime broker settles out of its own funds
- Margin loan: A resulting margin loan between prime broker and customer (in the amount paid by prime broker to executing broker to settle the trade.
Englishers should note that these transactions have a unusual quality of agency about them, the unintended consequences of which the SEC no-action letter is meant to ameliorate. In an English law arrangement, the trade settlement would be regarded as a principal trade from the get go — the practical difference between a delivery versus payment trade settlement done as agent and one done as principal being nil anyway.
Proposal
Regulation T provides that
The prime broker committee, chaired by Bear Stearns (remember them?) proposed to treat the trade settlement transaction between the prime broker and executing broker as an inter-dealer (principal) trade even though theoretically executed as agent for the client.