Template:M comp disc 2018 CSD 1(c): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "This is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the {{vmcsa}}. I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it someh..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the {{vmcsa}}. I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found self-confidence, and eschewed the elegant “the {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transactions}} specified in Paragraph {{vmcsaprov|11}}” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant {{imcsdprov|Covered Transactions (IM)}} specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph {{imcsdprov|13}}”. | [[1(c) - IM CSD Provision|This]] is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the {{vmcsa}}. I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found self-confidence, and eschewed the elegant “the {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transactions}} specified in Paragraph {{vmcsaprov|11}}” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant {{imcsdprov|Covered Transactions (IM)}} specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph {{imcsdprov|13}}”. | ||
Why do you do this to your reading public,. {{icds}}? | Why do you do this to your reading public,. {{icds}}? | ||
Revision as of 09:22, 21 April 2021
This is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the 2016 VM CSA. I don’t know what happened to ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found self-confidence, and eschewed the elegant “the Covered Transactions specified in Paragraph 11” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant Covered Transactions (IM) specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 13”.
Why do you do this to your reading public,. ISDA’s crack drafting squad™?