Chitty Chitty Bang Bang: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{a|plainenglish|}}A tenuous academic argument about contractual interpretation between two leagle eagles, the outcome of which will have no commercial bearing whatsoe..."
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|plainenglish|}}A tenuous academic argument about [[contract]]ual interpretation between two [[leagle eagle]]s, the outcome of which will have no commercial bearing whatsoever on either of the parties to that contract. Made into a derivative film starring Dick Van Dyke in the 1960s.
{{a|plainenglish|}}A tenuous academic argument about [[contract]]ual interpretation between two [[legal eagle]]s, the outcome of which will have no commercial bearing whatsoever on either of the parties to that contract. Made into a derivative film starring Dick Van Dyke in the 1960s.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Latest revision as of 09:25, 15 May 2021

Towards more picturesque speech
SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A tenuous academic argument about contractual interpretation between two legal eagles, the outcome of which will have no commercial bearing whatsoever on either of the parties to that contract. Made into a derivative film starring Dick Van Dyke in the 1960s.

See also

Toot-sweet