Template:Ddq capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:<br>
Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:<br>


{{quote|“That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a [[due diligence questionnaire]]. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”}}<br>
{{quote|“That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a [[due diligence questionnaire]]. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”}}
{{quote|“That is a matter of [[fact]]. I am a [[lawyer]]. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in [[operations]].”}}
{{quote|“That is a matter of [[fact]]. I am a [[lawyer]]. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in [[operations]].”}}

Revision as of 16:06, 23 June 2021

The JC’s practical guide for legal eagles on how to respond to requests to help fill out due diligence questionnaires:

Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:

“That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a due diligence questionnaire. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”

“That is a matter of fact. I am a lawyer. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in operations.”