Extraordinary rendition: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|plainenglish|}}Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the ''UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of an Innocent and Much-Loved Language''. | {{a|plainenglish|}}Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the ''UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of an Innocent and Much-Loved Language''. | ||
The first identified violation was Clifford Chance’s non-definition of Companies in its 2021 [[GMRA]] [[ | The first identified violation was Clifford Chance’s non-definition of Companies in its 2021 [[GMRA]] [[netting opinion]] (where else) where our learned colleagues, having devoted some 700 words to the question of what companies are, then throws another 150 explaining, in excruciating detail, what they are ''not''. | ||
{{quote|For the purpose of this opinion, the word “'''[[Company|companies]]'''” shall neither refer to economic interest groups (''groupements d’interêts économiques'') nor European economic interest groups (''groupements d’interêts économiques européens''). It shall furthermore not encompass any entities listed hereafter or any entities which are subject to a specific legislative framework or any specific licensing requirements, such as, [[without limitation]], reinsurance undertakings, pension funds, investment companies in risk capital, securitisation vehicles, [[Alternative Investment Fund Management Directive|alternative investment fund managers]] subject to the Luxembourg law of 12 July 2013 on investment fund managers (as amended) (the “'''AIFM Law'''”), alternative investment funds subject to the AIFM law other than UCI or reserved alternative investment funds (fonds d’investissement alternatrives reserves (“'''RAIF'''”) which are additionally subject to the Luxembourg law of 2016 on RAIF (as amended) (except the extent such entities are specifically covered in Appendix 2 part 1).}} | {{quote|For the purpose of this opinion, the word “'''[[Company|companies]]'''” shall neither refer to economic interest groups (''groupements d’interêts économiques'') nor European economic interest groups (''groupements d’interêts économiques européens''). It shall furthermore not encompass any entities listed hereafter or any entities which are subject to a specific legislative framework or any specific licensing requirements, such as, [[without limitation]], reinsurance undertakings, pension funds, investment companies in risk capital, securitisation vehicles, [[Alternative Investment Fund Management Directive|alternative investment fund managers]] subject to the Luxembourg law of 12 July 2013 on investment fund managers (as amended) (the “'''AIFM Law'''”), alternative investment funds subject to the AIFM law other than UCI or reserved alternative investment funds (fonds d’investissement alternatrives reserves (“'''RAIF'''”) which are additionally subject to the Luxembourg law of 2016 on RAIF (as amended) (except the extent such entities are specifically covered in Appendix 2 part 1).}} | ||
Revision as of 11:35, 19 July 2021
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of an Innocent and Much-Loved Language.
The first identified violation was Clifford Chance’s non-definition of Companies in its 2021 GMRA netting opinion (where else) where our learned colleagues, having devoted some 700 words to the question of what companies are, then throws another 150 explaining, in excruciating detail, what they are not.
For the purpose of this opinion, the word “companies” shall neither refer to economic interest groups (groupements d’interêts économiques) nor European economic interest groups (groupements d’interêts économiques européens). It shall furthermore not encompass any entities listed hereafter or any entities which are subject to a specific legislative framework or any specific licensing requirements, such as, without limitation, reinsurance undertakings, pension funds, investment companies in risk capital, securitisation vehicles, alternative investment fund managers subject to the Luxembourg law of 12 July 2013 on investment fund managers (as amended) (the “AIFM Law”), alternative investment funds subject to the AIFM law other than UCI or reserved alternative investment funds (fonds d’investissement alternatrives reserves (“RAIF”) which are additionally subject to the Luxembourg law of 2016 on RAIF (as amended) (except the extent such entities are specifically covered in Appendix 2 part 1).