Eagle Squad: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Now, James Bond famously had a licence to kill, but — let’s face facts — there is only so much you can do with that. Once you have bumped off Scaramanga that’s really that. | Now, James Bond famously had a licence to kill, but — let’s face facts — there is only so much you can do with that. Once you have bumped off Scaramanga that’s really that. | ||
[[Eagle Squad]]’s power is all the more fearful in that it contemplates indefinite torture of the ''living''. Legal can insist on the most petulant, self-contradictory or wilful editions, on pain of ''everyone having to stop and wait till the matter is resolved''. Whereas others in the legal documentation flow — notably, the heoric, benighted [[negotiator]]s who are the real brave | [[Eagle Squad]]’s power is all the more fearful in that it contemplates indefinite torture of the ''living''. Legal can insist on the most petulant, self-contradictory or wilful editions, on pain of ''everyone having to stop and wait till the matter is resolved''. Whereas others in the legal documentation flow — notably, the heoric, benighted [[negotiator]]s who are the real brave foot-soldiers of legal practice, however hotly the [[eaglery]] denies it — have meaningful commercial constraints on the perversity they can bring to their task, a fully credentialised Eagle Squad member suffers no such constraint. | ||
Negotiators are measured, their performance gauged, their daily activity reduced to [[metric]]s, [[service level agreement]]s, [[KPI]]s — the whole ornate ''smörgåsbord'' of [[modernist]] fripperies by which their overlords can impel them to carry on — propel them to find solutions, make accommodations, engineer compromises and basically box on with no allowance for gratuitous abstrusity — but | |||
She can resist a [[Sovereign immunity|sovereign immunity waiver]] from an industrial corporate having no particular association with any organ of state indefinitely, on principle, notwithstanding the fatuity of the request — indeed, ''because'' of the fatuity of the request! — with no second-guessing or cajoling from the cheap-seats. It does not matter that the customer would have no hope of ''claiming'' sovereign immunity | She can resist a [[Sovereign immunity|sovereign immunity waiver]] from an industrial corporate having no particular association with any organ of state indefinitely, on principle, notwithstanding the fatuity of the request — indeed, ''because'' of the fatuity of the request! — with no second-guessing or cajoling from the cheap-seats. It does not matter that the customer would have no hope of ''claiming'' sovereign immunity | ||
Revision as of 16:23, 17 May 2022
|
Office anthropology™
|
The brave men and women of the GCHQ, here to save the world.
Legal eagles have unique empowerment from the highest reaches of the great modernist machine.
Now, James Bond famously had a licence to kill, but — let’s face facts — there is only so much you can do with that. Once you have bumped off Scaramanga that’s really that.
Eagle Squad’s power is all the more fearful in that it contemplates indefinite torture of the living. Legal can insist on the most petulant, self-contradictory or wilful editions, on pain of everyone having to stop and wait till the matter is resolved. Whereas others in the legal documentation flow — notably, the heoric, benighted negotiators who are the real brave foot-soldiers of legal practice, however hotly the eaglery denies it — have meaningful commercial constraints on the perversity they can bring to their task, a fully credentialised Eagle Squad member suffers no such constraint.
Negotiators are measured, their performance gauged, their daily activity reduced to metrics, service level agreements, KPIs — the whole ornate smörgåsbord of modernist fripperies by which their overlords can impel them to carry on — propel them to find solutions, make accommodations, engineer compromises and basically box on with no allowance for gratuitous abstrusity — but
She can resist a sovereign immunity waiver from an industrial corporate having no particular association with any organ of state indefinitely, on principle, notwithstanding the fatuity of the request — indeed, because of the fatuity of the request! — with no second-guessing or cajoling from the cheap-seats. It does not matter that the customer would have no hope of claiming sovereign immunity
This is ineffable legal stuff; the risks of compromise passeth all muggle comprehending, and that is that. Eagle Squad has not so much a licence to kill as a licence to die in a ditch.