Template:M summ Equity Derivatives 12.9(a): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tag: Replaced
Line 1: Line 1:


{{extraordinary events capsule}}
{{extraordinary events capsule}}
==Section-by-section==
===Sections {{eqderivprov|12.9(a)(vii)}} and {{eqderivprov|12.9(a)(iv)}} {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}}===
{{M summ Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(vii)-(iv)}}
===Section {{eqderivprov|12.9(a)(ix)}} {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}}===
{{M summ Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(ix)}}
===Section {{eqderivprov|12.9(a)(xii)}} {{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Party}}===
{{M summ Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(xii)}}
===Section {{eqderivprov|12.9(a)(xiii)}} {{eqderivprov|Maximum Stock Loan Rate}}===
{{M summ Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(xiii)}}

Revision as of 18:25, 30 July 2023

Break these “Extraordinary Events” into four categories:

Corporate events on Issuers: Corporate Events are generally benign[1] but not always expected or even wanted adjustments to the corporate structure and management of specific underlying SharesTender Offers, Mergers, management buyouts and events that change the economic proposition represented by those Shares, and not the equity derivative contract. So: Merger Events and Tender Offers;

Index adjustments: For Index trades, unexpected adjustments and changes to methodologies and publishing strategies of underlying Index (as opposed to changes in the composition of the Index according to its pre-existing rules) — collectively call these “Index Adjustment Events”. So:

Index Modification: Changes in the calculation methodology for the Index
Index Cancellation: Where Indexes are discontinued with replacement;
Index Disruption: disruption in the calculation and publication of Index values;

Negative events affecting Issuers: Nationalizations, Insolvency, Delisting of underlying Issuers;

Additional Disruption Events: Events which directly impair performance and risk management of the Transaction itself. These often cross over with market- and Issuer-dependent events above, but the emphasis here is their direct impact on the parties’ abilities to perform and hedge the derivative Transaction itself. So:

The Triple Cocktail: The Triple Cocktail of Change in Law, Hedging Disruption and Increased Cost of Hedging;
Stock borrow events: Specific issues relating to short-selling (Loss of Stock Borrow and Increased Cost of Stock Borrow); and
Random ones that aren’t needed or used: Two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the Triple Cocktail anyway — Failure to Deliver under the Transaction on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, Insolvency Filing[2].
  1. “Benign” from the point of view of the target company’s solvency and market prospects; not quite so benign from its management team’s prospects of ongoing employment.
  2. especially since there is already an “Insolvency” event covering most of this).