Template:M summ GMRA 6(d): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Some proper “thanks for writing in, fellas” moments here for {{icmacds}}. Like paragraph {{gmraprov|6(d)}}, which bestows on the contractual counter..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[6 - GMRA Provision|Some]] proper “thanks for writing in, fellas” moments here for {{icmacds}}. Like paragraph {{gmraprov|6(d)}}, which bestows on the contractual counterparties the unilateral right to [[waive]] their own contractual rights — gee whizz, I never — and which is peppered cryptically throughout the rest of the document “, subject to paragraph {{gmraprov|6(d)}}” — leading unsuspecting readers to believe this mysterious paragraph 6(d) must actually ''do'' something more consequential rather than stating the bleeding obvious.
===Paragraph {{gmraprov|6(d)}}===
[[6 - GMRA Provision|Some]] proper “thanks for writing in, fellas” moments here for {{icmacds}}. Like paragraph {{gmraprov|6(d)}}, which bestows on the contractual counterparties the unilateral right to [[waive]] their own contractual rights — gee whizz, I never — and which is peppered cryptically throughout the rest of the document “, subject to paragraph {{gmraprov|6(d)}}” — leading unsuspecting readers to believe this mysterious paragraph {{gmraprov|6(d)}} must actually ''do'' something more consequential rather than stating the bleeding obvious.

Revision as of 08:30, 6 June 2022

Paragraph 6(d)

Some proper “thanks for writing in, fellas” moments here for ICMA’s crack drafting squad™. Like paragraph 6(d), which bestows on the contractual counterparties the unilateral right to waive their own contractual rights — gee whizz, I never — and which is peppered cryptically throughout the rest of the document “, subject to paragraph 6(d)” — leading unsuspecting readers to believe this mysterious paragraph 6(d) must actually do something more consequential rather than stating the bleeding obvious.