Template:Thirteenth law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[JC]]’s ''' [[thirteenth law of worker entropy]]''', also known as the [[optical complication theorem]], states that over time, a given legal template will tend to a point of optimal complication ''(c)'' which is a function of (i) the highest plausibly chargeable fraction of the typical value (v) of contracts using that template, (ii) the time required to manipulate the template so it reliably works to the satisfaction of a lawyer having the patience, skill and hubris to understand it ''(t)'', and (iii) the charge-out rate that lawyer ''(r)''. | The [[JC]]’s ''' [[thirteenth law of worker entropy]]''', also known as the [[optical complication theorem]], states that over time, a given legal template will tend to a point of optimal complication ''(c)'' which is a function of | ||
:(i) the highest plausibly chargeable fraction of the typical value (v) of contracts using that template, | |||
The relationship between ''c'', ''v'', ''t'' and ''r'' is as follows | :(ii) the time required to manipulate the template so it reliably works to the satisfaction of a lawyer having the patience, skill and hubris to understand it ''(t)'', and | ||
:''c ↔ v = tr.'' <br> | :(iii) the charge-out rate that lawyer ''(r)''. | ||
The relationship between ''c'', ''v'', ''t'' and ''r'' is as follows: ''c ↔ v = tr.'' <br> | |||
Revision as of 13:37, 22 June 2022
The JC’s thirteenth law of worker entropy, also known as the optical complication theorem, states that over time, a given legal template will tend to a point of optimal complication (c) which is a function of
- (i) the highest plausibly chargeable fraction of the typical value (v) of contracts using that template,
- (ii) the time required to manipulate the template so it reliably works to the satisfaction of a lawyer having the patience, skill and hubris to understand it (t), and
- (iii) the charge-out rate that lawyer (r).
The relationship between c, v, t and r is as follows: c ↔ v = tr.