From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{a|negotiation|{{image|Or any part thereof|png|Stick ''that'' in your pipe and smoke it, [[Counselor]]}}}}A [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer’s]] stock-in-trade, her currency, the oxygen that gives her daily routine meaning and her role physical substance. For what is she if not her comments?
| | #redirect[[mark-up]] |
| | |
| ''[[Ego sum id quod dico]]'' - ''[[Si quaeris causidicum loqui, locutus est tibi]]''
| |
| | |
| If you ask a lawyer for [[comments]], she will give you some, whether your draft needed them or not. This is a founding crux of the [[anal paradox]]. For a [[mark-up]] proves your lawyer has read the agreement, considered its content, and justified her fee. ''It Is in her nature''. It is what she does.
| |
| | |
| No text is immune from adjustment, and if your only objective is to show you've read it, slipping in a harmless “[[for the avoidance of doubt]]”, a “[[without limitation]]”, an “[[as the case may be]]” or — though on a fraught negotiation this is pushing it, be warned — an “[[(if any)]]” is a professionally satisfying but yet non-invasive way of achieving that.
| |
| | |
| No such ornamentation is [[calculated]] to improve the elegance of the text, of course. To do that you will need to disentangle some convoluted grammar — perhaps by deleting an “[[as the case may be]]”.<ref> be careful not to ''add'' the same thing in one place and ''delete'' it in another: this will be seen as hostile action.</ref> This will be seen as enemy action, especially if your edits are not directed at ''some'' legal content, however spurious. It is also axiomatic that all [[legal mark-up]] must overcome the [[Biggs threshold]].
| |
| ===The [[Biggs threshold]]===
| |
| {{bold full stop}}
| |
| {{sa}}
| |
| *[[Anal paradox]]
| |
| {{ref}}
| |
Latest revision as of 10:46, 14 October 2022