Shall constitute: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|drafting|}}{{Quote|I think, therefore I shall be deemed to be constituted. | {{a|drafting|}}{{Quote|I think, therefore I shall be deemed to be constituted. | ||
: | :—[[René Descartes]], ''Discourse on the Legal Method'' (1683)}} | ||
A legal way of saying “is”. | A legal way of saying “is”. “[[Constitute]]” scores over “[[be]]” in that it is highly ''regular'', and the different forms of a given tense require no [[conjugation]]: | ||
I ''shall constitute'' | I ''am''<br> | I ''shall constitute'' | I ''am''<br> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
They ''shall constitute'' | They ''are''<br> | They ''shall constitute'' | They ''are''<br> | ||
On the other hand it is ''the most violent offender against the mores of plain English. | But that is no reason to favour it. On the other hand it is ''the most violent offender against the mores of plain English. | ||
“Be” is the citadel; it sits on a velvet cushion in the most heavily fortified dungeon of the keep. There is no plainer word than ''be''. It is the first word a non-English speaker learns on her long journey to being culturally hegemonised. There is no-one — not the dullest first grade student, who doesn’t understand profoundly what it means. | “Be” is the citadel; it sits on a velvet cushion in the most heavily fortified dungeon of the castle’s keep. There is ''no'' plainer word than ''be''. It is the first word a non-English speaker learns on her long journey to being culturally hegemonised. There is no-one — not the dullest first grade student, who doesn’t understand profoundly what it means. | ||
“Constitute” adds nothing to “be”. It is no more specific, no more precise, there is no nuance of meaning it captures that “be” does not. | “Constitute” adds nothing to “be”. It is no more specific, no more precise, there is no nuance of meaning it captures that “be” does not. | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 15 November 2022
|
The JC’s guide to writing nice.™
|
I think, therefore I shall be deemed to be constituted.
- —René Descartes, Discourse on the Legal Method (1683)
A legal way of saying “is”. “Constitute” scores over “be” in that it is highly regular, and the different forms of a given tense require no conjugation:
I shall constitute | I am
You shall constitute | You are
He, she or it shall constitute | He, she or it is
We shall constitute | we are
You shall constitute | You are
They shall constitute | They are
But that is no reason to favour it. On the other hand it is the most violent offender against the mores of plain English.
“Be” is the citadel; it sits on a velvet cushion in the most heavily fortified dungeon of the castle’s keep. There is no plainer word than be. It is the first word a non-English speaker learns on her long journey to being culturally hegemonised. There is no-one — not the dullest first grade student, who doesn’t understand profoundly what it means.
“Constitute” adds nothing to “be”. It is no more specific, no more precise, there is no nuance of meaning it captures that “be” does not.