Third party: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:41, 3 December 2022

Financial cosmology
The JC’s guide to theoretical physics in the markets.™

Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Cosmology Lexophysics

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

If we take it it as granted, per the experimental lexophysics of pioneers such as J.F.M. Biggs that traditional Euclidean geometry does not adequately describe the space-tedium continuum, with its in-folded inclusos, provisos, provisos, then we have to consider whether the usual three-dimensional model of the legal universe is still fit for purpose.

A naive view of commerce would say there are three “dimensions”: the two contractual counterparties (“Party A” and “Party B” or, for old fashioned finance types, “Bank” and “Borrower”) and then the remainder of the universe comprising disinterested third parties.

Tony Blair, of all people, tried to warp the continuum with his ill-fated Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{a|cosmology|}} if we take it it as granted, per the experimental lexa physics of pioneers such as [[J.F.M. Biggs]] that traditional Euclidean geometry does not adequately describe the [[space-tedium continuum]], with its in-folded [[incluso]]s, [[proviso]]s, [[proviso]]s, then we have to consider whether the usual tripartite dimensional structure is appropriate.
+{{a|cosmology|}}If we take it it as granted, per the experimental [[lexophysics]] of pioneers such as [[J.F.M. Biggs]] that traditional Euclidean geometry does not adequately describe the [[space-tedium continuum]], with its in-folded [[incluso]]s, [[proviso]]s, [[proviso]]s, then we have to consider whether the usual three-dimensional model of the legal universe is still fit for purpose.
-A naive view of commerce would say there is the contractual counterparties (“[[Party A]]” and “[[Party B]]” or, for old fashioned finance types, “[[Bank]]” and “[[Borrower]]”) and the remainder of the universe comprising disinterested third parties.
+A naive view of commerce would say there are three “dimensions”: the two contractual counterparties (“[[Party A]]” and “[[Party B]]” or, for old fashioned finance types, “[[Bank]]” and “[[Borrower]]”) and then the remainder of the universe comprising disinterested third parties.
+Tony Blair, of all people, tried to warp the continuum with his ill-fated [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999]]

Third party: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:41, 3 December 2022

Navigation menu

Search