Ineffable: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|glossary|}}Undescribable, usually on account of wondrousness. It doesn’t, literally, mean “incomprehensible” — but it sort of does, because not being able to artic..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|glossary|}} | {{a|glossary|{{image|Quo Vadis|jpg|}}}}{{dpn|/ɪnˈɛfəbᵊl/|n}}Indescribable, usually on account of sheer wondrousness or cosmic scale. It doesn’t, literally, mean “incomprehensible” — but it sort of does, because not being able to articulate something is little different to being unable to understand it. I suppose one can’t describe the soaring beauty of Allegri’s ''Miserere'', Beethoven’s ''Pathetique'' or Status Quo’s ''Piledriver'' — but is that because it is beyond comprehension of mortal mind? | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Epistemology] | *[[Epistemology]] | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 10 April 2023
|
Ineffable
/ɪnˈɛfəbᵊl/ (n.)
Indescribable, usually on account of sheer wondrousness or cosmic scale. It doesn’t, literally, mean “incomprehensible” — but it sort of does, because not being able to articulate something is little different to being unable to understand it. I suppose one can’t describe the soaring beauty of Allegri’s Miserere, Beethoven’s Pathetique or Status Quo’s Piledriver — but is that because it is beyond comprehension of mortal mind?