Template:M comp disc Credit Derivatives 4.5: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[4.5 - Credit Derivatives Provision|The]] obvious comparison is with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}} of the {{isdama}}, though a closer practical analogue is {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}.
[[4.5 - Credit Derivatives Provision|The]] obvious comparison is with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}} of the {{isdama}}, though a closer practical analogue is {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. See also Potentioal Failure to Pay, which you might like to think would be the next provision, after {{cddprov|Failure to Pay}}, or maybe the previous one, or at least with the other {{cddprov|Credit Events}} in Article {{cddprov|4}}, but no, it its boundless wisdom {{icds}} saw fit to bury it at Article {{cddprov|1.48}}. It’s fun, though. It makes the {{cdd}} more like a treasure hunt.

Latest revision as of 09:40, 25 April 2023

The obvious comparison is with Section 5(a)(i) of the ISDA Master Agreement, though a closer practical analogue is Cross Default. See also Potentioal Failure to Pay, which you might like to think would be the next provision, after Failure to Pay, or maybe the previous one, or at least with the other Credit Events in Article 4, but no, it its boundless wisdom ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ saw fit to bury it at Article 1.48. It’s fun, though. It makes the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions more like a treasure hunt.