Template:M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(5)(D): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Section (d)(i)(5)(D) is the equivalent provision for {{eqderivprov|Suspension Events}}. It is most curious and really makes me think the JC must have missed something big here, because the sort of things you would expect to be consistent across various events that delay scheduled settlement: {{euaprov|Suspension}}, {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption}} and so on — things like Cost of Carry Amount - Emi..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Then I woke up and it was all a dream - Emissions Annex Provision|Section]] (d)(i)(5)(D) is the equivalent provision for {{ | [[Then I woke up and it was all a dream - Emissions Annex Provision|Section]] (d)(i)(5)(D) is the equivalent provision for {{euaprov|Suspension Events}}. It is most curious and really makes me think the JC must have missed something big here, because the sort of things you would expect to be consistent across various events that delay scheduled settlement: {{euaprov|Suspension}}, {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption}} and so on — things like [[Cost of Carry Amount - Emissions Annex Provision|Cost of Carry]] compensation — are different, whereas the one thing that you would expect to, well, to not be there at all, frankly — the [[then I woke up and it was all a dream]] termination sequence — is curiously '''consistent'''. |
Latest revision as of 15:40, 22 May 2023
Section (d)(i)(5)(D) is the equivalent provision for Suspension Events. It is most curious and really makes me think the JC must have missed something big here, because the sort of things you would expect to be consistent across various events that delay scheduled settlement: Suspension, Settlement Disruption and so on — things like Cost of Carry compensation — are different, whereas the one thing that you would expect to, well, to not be there at all, frankly — the then I woke up and it was all a dream termination sequence — is curiously consistent.