Template:Emissions No Encumbrances comp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things | *“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things | ||
*“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{efetma}} Allowances Annex. | *“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{efetma}} Allowances Annex. | ||
Here is a {{diff|77163|77164}} of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, {{diff|77164|77167}} IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the {{diff|77163|77167}} of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you. | |||
Revision as of 13:58, 31 July 2023
The absence of encumbrances — which, in the early days of the emissions trading world, where birth pangs still ricocheted and fraudulent waves lapped across the primordial carbon soup of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, was a matter of some concern — is covered fulsomely, and consistently, in all the emissions master trading documents. See:
- “No Encumbrances” (para (d)(vii) in the ISDA EU Emissions Annex
- “No Encumbrances” (cl 5.3) in the IETA Master Agreement and, of all things
- “No Encumbrances” (cl 6.3) in the EFET Master Agreement Allowances Annex.
Here is a comparison of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, comparison IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the comparison of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.