Template:Form and substance capsule: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Form versus substance in a nutshell==== | ====Form versus substance in a nutshell==== | ||
[[Form]] is the [[Map|map]]: simplified, rationalised, modularised: it establishes through followable rules, a safe passage through the incomprehensible thickness of the jungle. It tries to reduce ''[[complexity]]'' — scary, unmanageable, non-linear — to mere ''[[Complicated system|complication]]'' — fiddly, but tamable by punctilious attention to | [[Form]] is the [[Map|map]]: simplified, rationalised, modularised: it establishes through followable rules, a safe passage through the incomprehensible thickness of the jungle. It tries to reduce ''[[complexity]]'' — scary, unmanageable, [[non-linear]] — to mere ''[[Complicated system|complication]]'' — fiddly, but tamable by punctilious attention to ''detail'' — by prescribing fixed rules and procedures — [[process]] — which maybe followed even by those with no particular experience or expertise of the [[territory]], as long as they can ''read'' and are generally disposed to quickly and quietly ''doing what they are told''. The only judgment made of one in a formal system is, ''did you faithfully follow the rules?'' | ||
[[Substance and form|Substance]] is the [[Territory|territory]]: the fractal, inchoate, indeterminate, dancing, organic mass of messiness in which we are consigned to play our mortal games. Without a map, there is only one way to navigate the territory: by ''knowing'' it. Knowledge is an investment of time, patience, energy and skill. A map is a proxy, not a substitute for knowledge: one who knows the territory — an ''[[Subject matter expert|expert]]'' — will bridle upon being told to use a map. Would you use a map to navigate from the station to your own home? | [[Substance and form|Substance]] is the [[Territory|territory]]: the fractal, inchoate, indeterminate, dancing, organic mass of messiness in which we are consigned to play our mortal games. Without a map, there is only one way to navigate the territory: by ''knowing'' it. Knowledge is an investment of time, patience, energy and skill. A map is a proxy, not a substitute for knowledge: one who knows the territory — an ''[[Subject matter expert|expert]]'' — will bridle upon being told to use a map. Would you use a map to navigate from the station to your own home? | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 1 September 2023
Form versus substance in a nutshell
Form is the map: simplified, rationalised, modularised: it establishes through followable rules, a safe passage through the incomprehensible thickness of the jungle. It tries to reduce complexity — scary, unmanageable, non-linear — to mere complication — fiddly, but tamable by punctilious attention to detail — by prescribing fixed rules and procedures — process — which maybe followed even by those with no particular experience or expertise of the territory, as long as they can read and are generally disposed to quickly and quietly doing what they are told. The only judgment made of one in a formal system is, did you faithfully follow the rules?
Substance is the territory: the fractal, inchoate, indeterminate, dancing, organic mass of messiness in which we are consigned to play our mortal games. Without a map, there is only one way to navigate the territory: by knowing it. Knowledge is an investment of time, patience, energy and skill. A map is a proxy, not a substitute for knowledge: one who knows the territory — an expert — will bridle upon being told to use a map. Would you use a map to navigate from the station to your own home?