Template:Emissions Relevant Registry summ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Did we need a separate definition of “{{{{{1}}}|Relevant Registry}}”? Does it convey any nuance or additional colour that the lower-cased, colloquial, “''relevant'' {{{{{1}}}|Registry}}” does not. In our humble opinion, it does not. Do we really even need the word relevant? In what world would one be talking about a Registry that was ''ir''relevant? Do not get us started on all this business about there being mor..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Did we need a separate definition of “{{{{{1}}}|Relevant Registry}}”? Does it convey any nuance or additional colour that the lower-cased, colloquial, “''relevant'' {{{{{1}}}|Registry}}” does not. In our humble opinion, it does not. Do we really even need the word [[relevant]]? In what world, and why, would one be talking about a {{{{{1}}}|Registry}} that was ''ir''relevant? | |||
Do not get us started on all this business about there being more than one {{{{{1}}}|Specified Holding Account}}. | Do not get us started on all this business about there being more than one {{{{{1}}}|Specified Holding Account}}. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:33, 16 October 2023
Did we need a separate definition of “{{{{{1}}}|Relevant Registry}}”? Does it convey any nuance or additional colour that the lower-cased, colloquial, “relevant {{{{{1}}}|Registry}}” does not. In our humble opinion, it does not. Do we really even need the word relevant? In what world, and why, would one be talking about a {{{{{1}}}|Registry}} that was irrelevant?
Do not get us started on all this business about there being more than one {{{{{1}}}|Specified Holding Account}}.