Sell-side: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|people|}}A [[broker]], [[dealer]] or [[market-maker]]: one given to offering financial services and products  with a view to ''selling'' them — hence, the ''~-side'' — to the rapacious class of institutional investors and their agents and investment advisors whom, since they ''buy'' these things, we generally know as the “[[buy-side]]”.
{{a|people|}}A [[broker]], [[dealer]] or [[market-maker]]: one given to offering financial services and products  with a view to ''selling'' them — hence, the ''~-side'' — to the rapacious class of institutional investors and their agents and investment advisors whom, since they ''buy'' these things, we generally know as the “[[buy-side]]”.


Though a confederacy of dunces might wish to persuade you otherwise, the sell-side are the true heroes of the financial markets and, in case of any ambiguity, deserve the [[For the avoidance of doubt|benefit of the avoidance of doubt]].  
Three important things to bear in mind about the [[sell-side]]:
{{l1}}'''Dealers aspire to be market neutral''': Typically the sell-side dealers provide market exposure to customers without taking a market position themselves.<li>
'''Dealers delta-hedge''': since a [[swap|swap contract]] is inherently a principal-to-principal contract and not an [[Agent|agency]] arrangement, and since entering it necessarily means the dealer ''does'' change its market position, the dealer will execute an offsetting [[delta-hedge]] in the market to “flatten out” that position.<li>
'''Dealers are regulated''': Because their role tends to be systemically important and they aggregate a lot of risk taken on by their customers, dealers tend to be heavily regulated, both in terms of their conduct of business — with whom they can do business, and on what terms, and prudentially — in how they manage customer and market risk and how much capital they must hold. </ol>
''If'' dealers fail, it tends to be more or less apocalyptic for the market. But the market is getting better at managing the stress of dealer failures ([[Credit Suisse]] caused a lot less dislocation than did [[Lehman]]), and in truth [[dealer]]s do not fail that often.


In [[Hary Poter]] terms, the sell-side are from ''Gryffindor''.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Buy-side]]
*[[Buy-side]]
*[[Horcrux]]
*[[Horcrux]]
*[[Party A and Party B]]
*[[Party A and Party B]]

Revision as of 11:26, 14 January 2024

People Anatomy™
A spotter’s guide to the men and women of finance.
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A broker, dealer or market-maker: one given to offering financial services and products with a view to selling them — hence, the ~-side — to the rapacious class of institutional investors and their agents and investment advisors whom, since they buy these things, we generally know as the “buy-side”.

Three important things to bear in mind about the sell-side:

  1. Dealers aspire to be market neutral: Typically the sell-side dealers provide market exposure to customers without taking a market position themselves.
  2. Dealers delta-hedge: since a swap contract is inherently a principal-to-principal contract and not an agency arrangement, and since entering it necessarily means the dealer does change its market position, the dealer will execute an offsetting delta-hedge in the market to “flatten out” that position.
  3. Dealers are regulated: Because their role tends to be systemically important and they aggregate a lot of risk taken on by their customers, dealers tend to be heavily regulated, both in terms of their conduct of business — with whom they can do business, and on what terms, and prudentially — in how they manage customer and market risk and how much capital they must hold.

If dealers fail, it tends to be more or less apocalyptic for the market. But the market is getting better at managing the stress of dealer failures (Credit Suisse caused a lot less dislocation than did Lehman), and in truth dealers do not fail that often.

See also