Template:Csa 1 comp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
''Between English law and New York law'': The New York version also has a Para 1(b) explain what the reference to Secured Parties is all about, which are not germane to the title transfer-style English law versions of the Annex. | ''Between English law and New York law'': The New York version also has a Para 1(b) explain what the reference to Secured Parties is all about, which are not germane to the title transfer-style English law versions of the Annex. | ||
''VM versus IM'': The {{imcsd}} is, unusually for an English law document, a security interest arrangement which does not count as a Transaction. To clarity in the Interpretation section as to all of this. | |||
Revision as of 16:37, 31 March 2024
Between the {{{{{1}}}|OG}} and VM versions: Big change between 1995 and 2016 is the addition of Paragraph 1(b) in the 2016 VM CSA, rabbiting on about Other CSAs, Covered Transactions and so on.
Between English law and New York law: The New York version also has a Para 1(b) explain what the reference to Secured Parties is all about, which are not germane to the title transfer-style English law versions of the Annex.
VM versus IM: The 2018 English law IM CSD is, unusually for an English law document, a security interest arrangement which does not count as a Transaction. To clarity in the Interpretation section as to all of this.