Template:Csa Valuation Date summ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{l1}} | {{l1}} | ||
'''{{1994csa}} and {{1995csa}}''': Whatever you specified in your elections paragraph and, the older your document is, the more likely it is to be an arbitrary and quite unnervingly long period. <li> | '''{{1994csa}} and {{1995csa}}''': Whatever you specified in your elections paragraph and, the older your document is, the more likely it is to be an arbitrary and quite unnervingly long period. <li> | ||
'''{{2016nycsa}} and {{2016csa}}''': Unless otherwise specified in the elections paragraph, ''every'' day on which you’re both in the office in at least one of your {{{{{1}}}|Valuation Date Location}}s. ''Should'' the parties specify otherwise in their elections? No. Why would they? ''Will'' they? Experience suggests, for a dogged minority, they just might. Don’t be that guy. </ol | '''{{2016nycsa}} and {{2016csa}}''': Unless otherwise specified in the elections paragraph, ''every'' day on which you’re both in the office in at least one of your {{{{{1}}}|Valuation Date Location}}s. ''Should'' the parties specify otherwise in their elections? No. Why would they? ''Will'' they? Experience suggests, for a dogged minority, they just might. Don’t be that guy. </ol> |
Latest revision as of 13:47, 26 March 2024
Each day on which you can expect to exchange variation margin under a Credit Support Annex, which is:
- 1994 NY CSA and 1995 CSA: Whatever you specified in your elections paragraph and, the older your document is, the more likely it is to be an arbitrary and quite unnervingly long period.
- 2016 NY VM CSA and 2016 VM CSA: Unless otherwise specified in the elections paragraph, every day on which you’re both in the office in at least one of your {{{{{1}}}|Valuation Date Location}}s. Should the parties specify otherwise in their elections? No. Why would they? Will they? Experience suggests, for a dogged minority, they just might. Don’t be that guy.