Template:What is it in itself: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{capsital|Lecter}}: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek? <br>
{{capsital|Lecter}}: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek? <br>
'''Clarice Starling''': He kills women...  <br>
{{capsital|Clarice}}: He kills women...  <br>
{{capsital|Lecter}}: ''No''! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he ''serve'' by killing? <br>
{{capsital|Lecter}}: ''No''! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he ''serve'' by killing? <br>
'''Starling''': Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir... <br>
{{capsital|Clarice}}: Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir... <br>
{{capsital|Lecter}}: No! He ''covets''. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet? <br>
{{capsital|Lecter}}: No! He ''covets''. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet? <br>

Revision as of 15:56, 19 August 2024

Lecter: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?
Clarice: He kills women...
Lecter: No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?
Clarice: Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir...
Lecter: No! He covets. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet?