Template:Isda Automatic Early Termination comp: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isdacomparisons|83262|40195|40196}} | {{isdacomparisons|83262|40195|40196}} | ||
{{{{{1}}}|Automatic Early Termination}} first appears in the {{1992ma}}. 1987 was still early doors in the life of the over-the-counter derivatives market — the first swap was only six years earlier, remember — and the Basel Committee murmurings about the capital risks posed by infinite leverage were only really just starting to take flight. | {{{{{1}}}|Automatic Early Termination}} first appears as a named term in the {{1992ma}}. 1987 was still early doors in the life of the over-the-counter derivatives market — the first swap was only six years earlier, remember — and the Basel Committee murmurings about the capital risks posed by infinite leverage were only really just starting to take flight. Credit {{icds}} that they even thought about it, but assuming ''every'' insolvency regime in the world would jeopardise contractual provisions the moment a formal bankruptcy was declared was probably overkill. Well, it ''was'' overkill. Definitely. Yet another reason people should not use a {{1987ma}} | ||
The language of {{{{{1}}}|6(a)}} | In the {{1992ma}} the concept was given the name Automatic Early Termination, and was rendered as an electable option. Much more sensible. The language of {{{{{1}}}|6(a)}} did not change between the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}}. | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 6 September 2024
Redlines
- 1987 ⇒ 1992: Redline of the ’92 vs. the ’87: comparison (and in reverse)
- 1992 ⇒ 2002: Redline of the ’02 vs. the ’92: comparison (and in reverse)
- 1987 ⇒ 2002: Redline of the ’92 vs. the ’87: comparison (and in reverse)
Discussion
{{{{{1}}}|Automatic Early Termination}} first appears as a named term in the 1992 ISDA. 1987 was still early doors in the life of the over-the-counter derivatives market — the first swap was only six years earlier, remember — and the Basel Committee murmurings about the capital risks posed by infinite leverage were only really just starting to take flight. Credit ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ that they even thought about it, but assuming every insolvency regime in the world would jeopardise contractual provisions the moment a formal bankruptcy was declared was probably overkill. Well, it was overkill. Definitely. Yet another reason people should not use a 1987 ISDA
In the 1992 ISDA the concept was given the name Automatic Early Termination, and was rendered as an electable option. Much more sensible. The language of {{{{{1}}}|6(a)}} did not change between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.