Receipt and transmission of orders: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|euregulation|}}A person or firm only carrying out the regulated activity of '''receipt and transmission of orders''' under MiFID II would not have the same best execution obligations as those executing orders.  
{{a|euregulation|}}Reception and transmission of orders in relation to one or more financial instruments Is the very first investment service and activity listed in part A of Annex I of MiFID 2.
 
A person or firm only carrying out the regulated activity of '''receipt and transmission of orders''' under MiFID II would not have the same best execution obligations as those executing orders.  


Most of the pain and anguish surrounding [[RTO]] relates to transaction reporting.
Most of the pain and anguish surrounding [[RTO]] relates to transaction reporting.

Revision as of 13:40, 9 October 2024

The JC’s Reg and Leg resource™
EU Edition
Index: Click to expand:Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Reception and transmission of orders in relation to one or more financial instruments Is the very first investment service and activity listed in part A of Annex I of MiFID 2.

A person or firm only carrying out the regulated activity of receipt and transmission of orders under MiFID II would not have the same best execution obligations as those executing orders.

Most of the pain and anguish surrounding RTO relates to transaction reporting.