Deconstructionism: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|Philosophy|{{wmc|Gilles_Deleuze.webp|}}
{{a|philosophy|[[File:Michel_Foucault_1974_Brasil.jpg]]}}{{drop|A|
 
peculiarly ''French'' strand of [[post-modernism]] — leading lights numbering among them Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, Bruno Latour, Jean-François Lyotard, Gilles Deleuze
A peculiarly ''French'' strand of post-modernism — leading lights numbering among them Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, Bruno Latour, Jean-François Lyotard, Gilles Deleuze
and Julia Kristeva — all pictured with amusing roll neck sweaters, Galois cigarettes and wavily bohemian hairdos —  “deconstructionists” main industry was attacking existing power structures behind received knowledge, intending to wipe away the power structures and radically reinterpret the world. As such they were indeed historical, backwards-looking, and at the limit, faintly annoying: on their coat-tails came the current crop of grievance studies academics, firmly focussed on shit that has already happened and as such, can’t really be changed so much as just deconstructed and complained about.
and Julia Kristeva — all pictured with amusing roll neck sweaters, Galois cigarettes and wavby hairdos —  “deconstructionists” whose main industry was attacking existing power structures behind received knowledge, intending to wipe away the power structures and radically reinterpret the world

Revision as of 18:45, 14 October 2024

Philosophy

The JC looks deep into the well. Or abyss.
Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

{{drop|A| peculiarly French strand of post-modernism — leading lights numbering among them Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, Bruno Latour, Jean-François Lyotard, Gilles Deleuze and Julia Kristeva — all pictured with amusing roll neck sweaters, Galois cigarettes and wavily bohemian hairdos — “deconstructionists” main industry was attacking existing power structures behind received knowledge, intending to wipe away the power structures and radically reinterpret the world. As such they were indeed historical, backwards-looking, and at the limit, faintly annoying: on their coat-tails came the current crop of grievance studies academics, firmly focussed on shit that has already happened and as such, can’t really be changed so much as just deconstructed and complained about.