Henderson v Merrett: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "That rabble-rouser Lord Goff of Chievely: {{box|So far as ''{{google|Hedley Byrne}}'' itself is concerned Mr. Kaye reads the speeches as restricting the principle of assumpti...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


(emphasis mine).
(emphasis mine).
===See also===
*{{Casenote|Tai Hing Cotton Mill|Liu Chong Hing Bank}}
*[[Concurrent liability]]
*[[Contractual negligence]]