Basic Representations - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat2|isda|3(a)|2002|3(a)|1992}} | {{fullanat2|isda|3(a)|2002|3(a)|1992}} | ||
{{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}} | {{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}} | ||
An observant negotiator handling a {{1992ma}} might wish to add a new agency rep as Section 3(a)(vi. The framers of the ISDA thought this was such a good idea that they added a brand-new no-agency rep to the {{2002ma}}, only they can’t have felt it was basic enough to go in the {{isdaprov|Basic Representations}}, so they put it in a new clause all by itself at Section {{isdaprov|3(g)}}. | |||
But you don’t need it if you’re on a {2002ma}}, if that’s what you're wondering. |