Limited recourse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Of a {{tag|contract}}, that the [[obligor]]’s obligations under it are limited to a defined pool of assets. Usually the limitation of a claim in this way goes hand-in-hand with a security interest over the defined pool of assets. | Of a {{tag|contract}}, that the [[obligor]]’s obligations under it are limited to a defined pool of assets. Usually the limitation of a claim in this way goes hand-in-hand with a security interest over the defined pool of assets. | ||
Security and limited recourse are fundamental structural aspects of contracts with [[Special purpose vehicle|special purpose vehicles]] and [[investment fund]]s, so if you feel the urge to challenge these | Security and limited recourse are fundamental structural aspects of contracts with [[Special purpose vehicle|special purpose vehicles]] and [[investment fund]]s, so if you feel the urge to challenge these provisions, do yourself and everyone else on the deal a favour: save your breath. | ||
In the immortal words of the East Enders: “Leave it Phil! Leave it! He's not worth it.” | |||
===See also=== | ===See also=== | ||
*[[Bankruptcy remoteness]] | *[[Bankruptcy remoteness]] | ||
*[[Special purpose vehicle]] |