Permitted Receivers - OneNDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Who’s in=== | ===Who’s in=== | ||
*'''[[Professional advisers]]''': Not usually controversial because they are by nature bound by | *'''[[Professional advisers]]''': Not usually controversial because they are by nature bound by professional protocol and [[Fiduciary duty|fiduciary duties]] to respect [[confidentiality]] and may even buy you legal [[privilege]] for whatever that is worth these days. | ||
*'''Employees''': The corporate veil may be impermeable but you do need someone with a head and a beating heart to read and deal with the confidential information on the [[limited company]]’s behalf — but more fearful types may try to restrict which of your employees are in the gang (see below). | *'''Employees''': The corporate veil may be impermeable but you do need someone with a head, any kind of head, and a beating heart to read and deal with the {{confiprov|confidential information}} on the [[limited company]]’s behalf — but more fearful types may try to restrict which of your employees are in the gang (see below). | ||
*'''[[Regulator|Regulators]]''' — compulsory disclosure to competent regulatory bodies, courts, and so on. Marginally more controversial is the obligation to disclose at polite but non-binding request of regulators. | *'''[[Regulator|Regulators]]''' — compulsory disclosure to competent regulatory bodies, courts, and so on. Marginally more controversial is the obligation to disclose at polite but non-binding request of regulators. | ||
===Who’s out=== | ===Who’s out=== |