Inability of Head or Home Office to Perform Obligations of Branch - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isdaanat|5(e)}} | {{isdaanat|5(e)}} | ||
In a nutshell squared: ''If an {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}’s head office is subject to a [[Force Majeure Event - ISDA Provision|Force Majeure]] or {{isdaprov|Illegality}}, It | In a nutshell squared: ''If an {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}’s head office is subject to a [[Force Majeure Event - ISDA Provision|Force Majeure]] or {{isdaprov|Illegality}}, It can’t be [[whack|whacked]] for not performing a branch’s obligations under the Section {{isdaprov|10(a)}} rep.'' | ||
From the “shoot me” department, this multi-line bunker-buster introduced into the {{2002ma}} which, to give it some kind of credit, doesn’t generate a great deal of comment in the course of your average negotiation. That is as likely to be because it is so stupefyingly dull that no one has summoned the fortitude to read it as it is because it is a sensible, prudent allocation of risk. | From the “shoot me” department, this multi-line bunker-buster introduced into the {{2002ma}} which, to give it some kind of credit, doesn’t generate a great deal of comment in the course of your average negotiation. That is as likely to be because it is so stupefyingly dull that no one has summoned the fortitude to read it as it is because it is a sensible, prudent allocation of risk. |