Template:Isdaguaranteewarning: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
Should a client request a {{isdaprov|transaction}}-specific parental {{isdaprov|guarantee}} (or [[letter of credit]]) for a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under an {{isdama}} instead of the usual [[all obligations guarantee|“all obligations” guarantee]] of all the counterparty’s obligations under the {{isdama}}, hit the alarm button.  
Should a client request a {{isdaprov|transaction}}-specific parental {{isdaprov|guarantee}} (or [[letter of credit]]) for a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under an {{isdama}} instead of the usual [[all obligations guarantee|“all obligations” guarantee]] of all the counterparty’s obligations under the {{isdama}}, hit the alarm button.  


You should *never* agree to the {{isdaprov|guarantee}} of individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s (nor accept a [[letter of credit]] with respect to individual {{isdaprov|Transactions}}) under an {{isdama}}. If you do, because of the way {{isdama}}s are closed out under Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} — or rather, ''aren't'' closed out, you might find that just when you want your guarantee to pay, the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} it is guaranteeing isn’t there anymore:
You should ''never'' agree to the {{isdaprov|guarantee}} of individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s (nor accept a [[letter of credit]] with respect to individual {{isdaprov|Transactions}}) under an {{isdama}}. If you do, because of the way {{isdama}}s are closed out under Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} — or rather, ''aren't'' closed out, you might find that just when you want your guarantee to pay, the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} it is guaranteeing isn’t there anymore:


On a close-out, each {{isdaprov|Transaction}} is terminated, the individual close-out amounts are determined, they’re aggregated up to a single net sum (i.e. negative exposures are netted off against positive ones) and a single {{isdaprov|Close Out Amount}} is payable with respect to ''all terminated {{isdaprov|Transactions}}'' under {{isdaprov|6(e)}} ({{isdaprov|Payments on Early Termination}}) of the {{isdama}}.<ref>The {{isdama}} itself is never actually terminated, but carries impotently on in undead twilight, roaming the badlands like [[Nosferatu]] or the [[Flying Dutchman]], unloved, unredeemed, until the [[end of days]].</ref>
On a close-out, each {{isdaprov|Transaction}} is terminated, the individual close-out amounts are determined, they’re aggregated up to a single net sum (i.e. negative exposures are netted off against positive ones) and a single {{isdaprov|Close Out Amount}} is payable with respect to ''all terminated {{isdaprov|Transactions}}'' under {{isdaprov|6(e)}} ({{isdaprov|Payments on Early Termination}}) of the {{isdama}}.<ref>The {{isdama}} itself is never actually terminated, but carries impotently on in undead twilight, roaming the badlands like [[Nosferatu]] or the [[Flying Dutchman]], unloved, unredeemed, until the [[end of days]].</ref>


That is to say, payments following termination of a Transaction are *not* payable under the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} at all - they are payable under the {{isdama}} itself. Therefore, if the [[guarantee]] relates to the single {{isdaprov|Transaction}}, at the point you wish to rely on it (i.e., upon the party’s default), it will have gone, with no payment required. Vanished, [[Tannhäuser Gate|like tears in the rain]]. <br>
That is to say, payments following termination of a Transaction are *not* payable under the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} at all - they are payable under the {{isdama}} itself. Therefore, if the [[guarantee]] relates to the single {{isdaprov|Transaction}}, at the point you wish to rely on it (i.e., upon the party’s default), it will have gone, with no payment required. Vanished, [[Tannhäuser Gate|like tears in the rain]]. <br>