Hughes v Metropolitan Railway: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[promissory estoppel]], seized on by the late, great [[Lord Denning]] in the celebrated {{casenote|Central London Property Trust Ltd|High Trees House Ltd}}. | {{cn}}The leading case on [[waiver by estoppel]] and [[promissory estoppel]], seized on by the late, great [[Lord Denning]] in the celebrated {{casenote|Central London Property Trust Ltd|High Trees House Ltd}}. | ||
Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October. | Mr Hughes owned a property on the Euston Road. He let it to the Metropolitan Railway. the lease had a covenant requiring the leaseholder to repair on six months notice. Hughes served a notice to repair in October. |