Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 5(c): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
A {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} is something that is so beyond one’s control or expectation that it shouldn’t count as an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} or even a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} ''at all'' — at least until you’ve had a chance to sort yourself out, fashion a canoe paddle with a Swiss Army knife, jury-rig an aerial and get reconnected to the world wide web. | A {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} is something that is so beyond one’s control or expectation that it shouldn’t count as an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} or even a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} ''at all'' — at least until you’ve had a chance to sort yourself out, fashion a canoe paddle with a Swiss Army knife, jury-rig an aerial and get reconnected to the world wide web. | ||
===Non-[[Repudiatory breach|repudiatory]] {{isdaprov|Breach of Agreement}}=== | ===Non-[[Repudiatory breach|repudiatory]] {{isdaprov|Breach of Agreement}}=== | ||
Note that the subordination of | Note that the subordination of {{isdaprov|Events of Default}} to {{isdaprov|Illegality}} and {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}} in section {{isdaprov|5(c)(i)}} are specifically excludes a [[Repudiatory breach|repudiatory]] Breach of Agreement as contemplated under the newly introduced section 5(a)(ii)(2), and any {{isdaprov|Credit Support Default}} other than a direct, and non-[[Repudiatory breach|repudiatory]], default by the {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}. Why? Well, firstly this is about unitary Events ofDefault which are ''directly caused by'' {{isdaprov|Illegality}} or {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}}, not simply ones which are coincidental with them, and secondly, if you have actually [[Repudiation|repudiated]] the contract — that is to say, point-blank ''refused'' to perform its clear terms — and, by lucky hap, your [[repudiation]] coincides with an {{isdaprov|Illegality}}, then your counterparty should not be obliged to give you the benefit of the doubt and have to close you out via the more genteel route of an {{isdaprov|Illegality}} {{isdaprov|Termination Event}}. | ||
If you’ve thrown your toys out of the pram, expected to be spanked, that is to say.<ref>It ought to go without saying that the [[Jolly Contrarian]] does not condone corporal punishment to wanton boys, although it never did him any harm.</ref> |