Extraordinary rendition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the UN convention against the cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of language. | Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the UN convention against the cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of language. | ||
{{icds}} are past masters, of course — the {{imcsd}} is a high watermark — but an interesting recent case was [[Clifford Chance]] [[Luxembourg lawyer|Luxembourg]]’s ''non''-definition of “[[Company|companies]]” in its 2021 [[GMRA]] [[netting opinion]] (where else?). | {{icds}} are past masters, of course — the {{imcsd}} is a high watermark — but an interesting recent case was [[Clifford Chance]] [[Luxembourg lawyer|Luxembourg]]’s ''non''-definition — what we like to call a “[[definisn’t]]” — of “[[Company|companies]]” in its 2021 [[GMRA]] [[netting opinion]] (where else?). | ||
Here our learned colleagues, having devoted hundreds of words to what Luxembourg companies ''are'', then embarked on hundreds more musing, in excruciating detail, on what they are ''not''. | Here our learned colleagues, having devoted hundreds of words to what Luxembourg companies ''are'', then embarked on hundreds more musing, in excruciating detail, on what they are ''not''. | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Definisn’t]] | |||
*[[Netting opinion]] | *[[Netting opinion]] | ||
*[[Luxembourg lawyer]] | *[[Luxembourg lawyer]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} |