Template:M summ Equity Derivatives 12.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===All hail the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}=== Note that where an {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Event}} occurs, the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}, rather than the {{eq...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===All hail the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}=== | ===All hail the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}=== | ||
Note that where an {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Event}} occurs, the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}, rather than the {{eqderivprov|Calculation Agent}}, may be the person called on to calculate a {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}}. (This is relevant especially where the {{eqderivprov|Calculation Agent}} is not the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}}, as the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} will have definite ideas about how to value cancellation vis a vis its own hedge). | Note that where an {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Event}} occurs, the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}, rather than the {{eqderivprov|Calculation Agent}}, may be the person called on to calculate a {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}}. (This is relevant especially where the {{eqderivprov|Calculation Agent}} is not the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}}, as the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} will have definite ideas about how to value cancellation vis a vis its own hedge). | ||
==={{eqderivprov|Share for Share}}=== | |||
Is it just is or did {{icds}} hit the wall on the definition of {{eqderivprov|Share for Share}}? What do you mean “and (ii) {{eqderivprov|Reverse Merger}}”? It ''looks like'' something is missing, but we think the rather exasperated tone is basically, “a reverse merger is necessarily {{eqderivprov|Share-for-Share}} so do we really nned to “wrap it round with deemery”, as {{Buchstein}} would say? Well, we are jolly well not going to, so see how you like that.” | |||