Template:M summ Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(iii): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Not generally stipulated as an Additional Disruption Event because firstly it would only be relevant in a physically-settled swap, and for a host of reasons a physicsally sett...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Not generally stipulated as an Additional Disruption Event because firstly it would only be relevant in a physically-settled swap, and for a host of reasons a physicsally settled synthetic instrument is a bit of a contradiction in terms — and in any case a settlement failure due to illiquidity is a racingly certain prospect in certain stock lines, and is more the rule than the exception in others, and is generally dealt with through buy-ins.
Not generally stipulated as an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}} because firstly it would only be relevant in a [[physically-settled]] equity swap, and for a host of reasons taking physical settlement at the conclusion of a synthetic transaction, whose point is partly to avoid a physical exposure, is a bit of a contradiction in terms. Now where you do, for reasons best known to yourself, elect physical settlement this provision allows the innocent party to buy-in and charge any cost differential to the failing party.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_summ_Equity_Derivatives_12.9(a)(iii)"