Template:M comp disc EFET Allowance Annex 7.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Functionally, the definition of Force Majeure is the same in the EFET and IETA versions. Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}}: the differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not.") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Functionally, the definition of Force Majeure is the same in the EFET and IETA versions. Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}}: the differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not. | Functionally, the definition of {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} is the same in the EFET and IETA versions. Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}}: the differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not. | ||
The equivalent under the {{emissionsannex}} is the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the {{isdama}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else. | |||