Thompson v Davenport: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "A formative but ultimately uninfluential case on the principle of undisclosed agency in which Lord Tenterden devised a rule (that an undisclosed princi..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A formative but ultimately uninfluential case on the principle of [[undisclosed agent|undisclosed agency]] in which Lord Tenterden devised a rule (that an undisclosed [[principal]] is not liable to the [[vendor]] if the [[principal]] has paid or settled accounts with the [[agent]]) which Parke B roundly dissed in the subsequent case of {{casenote|Heald|Kenworthy}}. Discussed at some length in {{casenote|Poretta|Superior Dowel Company}} (transcript [http://law.justia.com/cases/maine/supreme-court/1957/137-a-2d-361-0.html here].
A formative but ultimately uninfluential case on the principle of [[undisclosed agent|undisclosed agency]] in which Lord Tenterden devised a rule (that an undisclosed [[principal]] is not liable to the [[vendor]] if the [[principal]] has paid or settled accounts with the [[agent]]) which Parke B roundly dissed in the subsequent case of {{casenote|Heald|Kenworthy}}. Discussed at some length in the US case {{casenote|Poretta|Superior Dowel Company}} (transcript [http://law.justia.com/cases/maine/supreme-court/1957/137-a-2d-361-0.html here]).

Revision as of 15:13, 14 November 2016

A formative but ultimately uninfluential case on the principle of undisclosed agency in which Lord Tenterden devised a rule (that an undisclosed principal is not liable to the vendor if the principal has paid or settled accounts with the agent) which Parke B roundly dissed in the subsequent case of Heald v Kenworthy. Discussed at some length in the US case Poretta v Superior Dowel Company (transcript here).