Restitution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m Amwelladmin moved page Unjust enrichment to Restitution |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A claim made feasible through an imaginative synthesis of long-“forgotten” rules of the {{tag|common law}} dreamt up by Lord Goff to bring justice to [[little old ladies]]. | A claim made feasible through an imaginative synthesis of long-“forgotten” rules of the {{tag|common law}} dreamt up by Lord Goff to bring justice to [[little old ladies]]. | ||
Gave rise to an entire branch of civil law known as [[restitution]], which sits uneasily between the law of [[contract]] and [[tort]], seeming as it does to confuse the two. | Gave rise to an entire branch of civil law known as [[restitution]], which sits uneasily between the law of [[contract]] and [[tort]], seeming as it does to confuse the two. | ||
{{seealso}} | |||
*[[contract]] | |||
*[[tort]] | |||
*[[damages]] | |||
{{egg}} | {{egg}} | ||
Revision as of 09:02, 31 March 2017
A claim made feasible through an imaginative synthesis of long-“forgotten” rules of the common law dreamt up by Lord Goff to bring justice to little old ladies. Gave rise to an entire branch of civil law known as restitution, which sits uneasily between the law of contract and tort, seeming as it does to confuse the two.