Lisle-Mainwaring v Kensington and Chelsea: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "On the falfsification of Latin maxims.. ''Anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt'', as they say, roundly routed in this great case in which decided that if a lady wish..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
On the falfsification of Latin maxims | [[File:Stripey House.png|thumb|right|The said stripey house]] | ||
On the falfsification of {{tag|Latin}} maxims. | |||
''[[Anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]'', as they say, roundly routed in this great case in which decided that if a lady wishes to paint her house with red and white stripes out of sheer bloody mindedness, then at law she is entitled to do so, at least as far as s215 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 is concerned. | |||
{{egg}} | |||
{{draft}} | |||
[[File:Lisle-mainwaring_v_RBKC.pdf|Judgment]] | |||
Revision as of 13:32, 25 April 2017
On the falfsification of Latin maxims.
Anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt, as they say, roundly routed in this great case in which decided that if a lady wishes to paint her house with red and white stripes out of sheer bloody mindedness, then at law she is entitled to do so, at least as far as s215 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 is concerned. File:Lisle-mainwaring v RBKC.pdf