Terry’s law: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the Latin maxim. ''quod occulo non videt, coquus non est culpandum'' Comes in two flavours: *covenants by which y..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the Latin maxim.
A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the {{tag|Latin}} maxim.


''quod occulo non videt, coquus non est culpandum''
''[[quod occulo non videt coquus non est culpandum]]''


Comes in two flavours:
Comes in two flavours:

Revision as of 09:03, 7 August 2017

A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the Latin maxim.

quod occulo non videt coquus non est culpandum

Comes in two flavours:

  • covenants by which you expect counterparties to promptly advise you of their breach of contract to you
  • Covenants the breach of which you cannot realistically expect to ever find out about.