Terry’s law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the {{tag|Latin}} maxim. | A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the {{tag|Latin}} maxim. | ||
''[[quod | ''[[quod oculo non videt coquus non est culpandum]]'' | ||
Comes in two flavours: | Comes in two flavours: | ||
Revision as of 11:14, 7 August 2017
A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the Latin maxim.
quod oculo non videt coquus non est culpandum
Comes in two flavours:
- covenants by which you expect counterparties to promptly advise you of their breach of contract to you
- Covenants the breach of which you cannot realistically expect to ever find out about.