Standard basis: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Standard basis is a term of art in English {{tag|civil procedure}} that, unlike so many other terms of that art (without prejudice, indemnity basis for example) ha...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Standard basis]] is a term of art in English {{tag|civil procedure}} that, unlike so many other terms of that art ([[without prejudice]], [[indemnity basis]] for example) has not found its way into the weave of English {{tag|contract}} law precisely because it states the bleeding obvious, and contract law provides for it already.
[[Standard basis]] is a term of art in English {{tag|civil procedure}} that, unlike so many other terms of that art ([[without prejudice]], [[indemnity basis]] for example) has not found its way into the weave of English {{tag|contract}} law precisely because it states the bleeding obvious, and contract law provides for it already.


Determination of costs on the "[[standard basis]]" means any doubt or disagreement as to the [[reasonableness]] of costs is the be awarded in favour of the recipient of the costs award. Strictly speaking this is litigation chat, but don’t be surprised to see trustees and custodians jamming it in to their security deeds.
Determination of costs on the "[[standard basis]]" means any costs will only be awarded if they are proportionate, even if (otherwise) they would have been [[reasonable]]. Strictly speaking this is litigation chat, but don’t be surprised to see trustees and custodians jamming it in to their security deeds.


{{box|
{{box|
Line 8: Line 8:
:''(b) resolve any doubt which it may have as to whether costs were reasonably and proportionately incurred or were reasonable and proportionate in amount in favour of the paying party.''
:''(b) resolve any doubt which it may have as to whether costs were reasonably and proportionately incurred or were reasonable and proportionate in amount in favour of the paying party.''
''Factors which the court may take into account are set out in rule 44.4.).''}}
''Factors which the court may take into account are set out in rule 44.4.).''}}


Instead, grasping lawyers will try to foist upon you: the [[indemnity basis]] of cost determination. Do not allow it.
Instead, grasping lawyers will try to foist upon you: the [[indemnity basis]] of cost determination. Do not allow it.


[http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part-44-general-rules-about-costs#rule44.3 Rule 44.3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure]
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part-44-general-rules-about-costs#rule44.3 Rule 44.3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure]

Latest revision as of 17:33, 12 September 2017

Standard basis is a term of art in English civil procedure that, unlike so many other terms of that art (without prejudice, indemnity basis for example) has not found its way into the weave of English contract law precisely because it states the bleeding obvious, and contract law provides for it already.

Determination of costs on the "standard basis" means any costs will only be awarded if they are proportionate, even if (otherwise) they would have been reasonable. Strictly speaking this is litigation chat, but don’t be surprised to see trustees and custodians jamming it in to their security deeds.

Where the amount of costs is to be assessed on the standard basis, the court will –

(a) only allow costs which are proportionate to the matters in issue. Costs which are disproportionate in amount may be disallowed or reduced even if they were reasonably or necessarily incurred; and
(b) resolve any doubt which it may have as to whether costs were reasonably and proportionately incurred or were reasonable and proportionate in amount in favour of the paying party.

Factors which the court may take into account are set out in rule 44.4.).

Instead, grasping lawyers will try to foist upon you: the indemnity basis of cost determination. Do not allow it.

Rule 44.3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure