Elephants and turtles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A Hindu myth with a pretty obvious logical flaw that atheists like to think neatly demolishes the intellectual pretensions of organized religion — which it does — while neatly demolishing the intellectual pretensions of secularists, lawyers, scientists and atheists at the same time. | A Hindu myth with a pretty obvious logical flaw that atheists like to think neatly demolishes the intellectual pretensions of organized religion — which it does — while neatly demolishing the intellectual pretensions of secularists, lawyers, scientists and atheists at the same time. | ||
For here is the problem, [[lazengem]]: Every good dictionary is circular. | For here is the problem, [[lazengem]]: ''Every'' good dictionary is circular. Not just the Hindu one. | ||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
Revision as of 14:43, 18 September 2017
A Hindu myth with a pretty obvious logical flaw that atheists like to think neatly demolishes the intellectual pretensions of organized religion — which it does — while neatly demolishing the intellectual pretensions of secularists, lawyers, scientists and atheists at the same time.
For here is the problem, lazengem: Every good dictionary is circular. Not just the Hindu one.