Fox pass: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As with any arcane and specialist subject, the documentation of derivatives is strewn with buried roots and [[faux pas]] for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an [[eye-ess-dee-aye]] (it's [[izder]]), or a transaction under it as a [[Sw-æp]] (it's [[Sw-ŏp]]). | As with any arcane and specialist subject, the {{isda}} documentation of derivatives is strewn with buried roots and [[faux pas]] for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an [[eye-ess-dee-aye]] (it's [[izder]]), or a transaction under it as a [[Sw-æp]] (it's [[Sw-ŏp]]). | ||
The {{gmsla}} is more benign for ingénues, on the other hand. | The {{gmsla}} is more benign for ingénues, on the other hand. [[jimzler]], [[gummizler]], [[gee-em-ess-ek-aye]] - all are fine. | ||
{{draft}}{{egg}} | {{draft}}{{egg}} | ||
Revision as of 14:18, 9 October 2017
As with any arcane and specialist subject, the ISDA documentation of derivatives is strewn with buried roots and faux pas for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an eye-ess-dee-aye (it's izder), or a transaction under it as a Sw-æp (it's Sw-ŏp).
The 2010 GMSLA is more benign for ingénues, on the other hand. jimzler, gummizler, gee-em-ess-ek-aye - all are fine.