Specified Indebtedness - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
A simple and innocuous enough looking provision. Ahh, but what to make of the definition of [[borrowed money]]? Could it include [[repo]]? (No, according to Simon Firth - see [[borrowed money|here]]) | A simple and innocuous enough looking provision. Ahh, but what to make of the definition of [[borrowed money]]? Could it include [[repo]]? (No, according to Simon Firth - see [[borrowed money|here]]) | ||
Of particular interest in the debate on {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. Please refer to that section for a fuller discussion. see also the somewhat clumsier (but materially similar) definition of {{ | Of particular interest in the debate on {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. Please refer to that section for a fuller discussion. see also the somewhat clumsier (but materially similar) definition of {{efetprov|Specified Indebtedness}} in the {{efetma}}. | ||
{{isdaanatomy}} | {{isdaanatomy}} |
Revision as of 08:57, 16 August 2012
In gory detail
1992 ISDA |
2002 ISDA |
Commentary
A simple and innocuous enough looking provision. Ahh, but what to make of the definition of borrowed money? Could it include repo? (No, according to Simon Firth - see here)
Of particular interest in the debate on Cross Default. Please refer to that section for a fuller discussion. see also the somewhat clumsier (but materially similar) definition of Specified Indebtedness in the EFET Master Agreement.